Convert JPG to WebP

Convert JPG photos to WebP and cut file size by 25–35% at the same quality. Batch convert in your browser for faster websites. No upload.

Your files are processed in your browser and never uploaded.

85

Higher means better quality and larger files.

Drop images here

Choose files

JPG, JPEG · up to 50 megapixels each · you can also paste

How to use

  1. Add your JPG files with drag and drop or the "Choose files" button.
  2. WebP is selected. Pick a quality; 80 is a good default for website photos.
  3. Download the WebP files individually or as a ZIP.

Features

Smaller at the same quality
WebP typically needs 25–35% fewer bytes than JPG for the same visual result.
Batch-friendly
Convert an entire image folder for your website in one pass.
Upright photos
EXIF orientation is applied, so photos display correctly even where browsers ignore orientation data.
Nothing uploaded
The WebP encoder runs in WebAssembly on your own device.

Why websites use WebP

Images are often 50% or more of a web page’s total size. Every kilobyte saved makes the page load faster, which matters for visitors on mobile connections and for search rankings, since Google’s Core Web Vitals measure how quickly the main content appears. WebP gives the same visual quality as JPG with noticeably fewer bytes, and it is now displayed by every current browser, which is why most large websites and image CDNs serve WebP by default.

JPG versus WebP in practice

Feature JPG WebP
Compression efficiency Baseline 25–35% smaller
Transparency No Yes
Animation No Yes
Browser support Universal All current browsers
Email and office apps Universal Inconsistent

The table shows why the choice depends on the destination. For your own website, WebP is the better format. For email attachments, documents and uploading to third-party services, stick with JPG.

How the conversion works

Each JPG is decoded with MozJPEG’s decoder in a background Web Worker, the EXIF orientation is applied so the image is upright, and the pixels are encoded with libwebp at the chosen quality. Camera metadata is not copied, so GPS coordinates in photos are not published along with your images. Because the work happens on your device, you can convert as many files as you like.

What about quality loss from re-encoding?

Converting from one lossy format to another always re-compresses the image, but the effect is small when you start from a good source. A camera or phone JPG at full resolution converted to WebP at quality 80 looks the same as the original at normal viewing sizes. The risk is with JPGs that were already heavily compressed, such as images saved from social media; converting those can make existing artefacts more noticeable, so use a higher quality setting, around 90, for them.

Tips for web images

Frequently asked questions

Is it worth converting JPG to WebP?

For images on a website you control, yes. Smaller images load faster, use less mobile data and improve page speed scores. For files you send to other people, JPG is still the more compatible choice.

Will converting reduce quality?

Both formats are lossy, so converting re-compresses the image. At WebP quality 80–90 the difference from the source JPG is not visible in normal viewing. Always convert from the highest-quality original you have.

How much smaller will my images be?

Typically 25–35% at a matching quality level. Photos straight from a camera often shrink by 50% or more, especially combined with resizing.

Can I convert WebP back to JPG later?

Yes, with the WebP to JPG converter, but each lossy conversion loses a little detail. Keep your original JPGs as masters.

Popular conversions

Related tools